|
androstenediol, point, gadgets, l glutamine, the zone diet, burning, cardiopathy, scale, tribex 500, accu measurefat loss design n/a, multi vitamin, nutritional supplements, bodymass index, ami accu measure fat tester by accu-fitness, used, bodyfat calculators, measure body fat, body fat monitors, bmi, fattrackgold digital body fat caliper and myotape combo,
|
BFMPreNew in differential the cross-validation group also correlated well with BFMDXA in both men (r = 0.936, p < 0.001) and women (r = 0.882, p < 0.001). The root mean square error (RMSE) for the validation group was 2.03 kg in men differential and 3.40 kg in women, and the pure error for the cross-validation group was 2.98 kg in men and 3.38 kg in women. Final Equations for the Prediction of BFM Final differential equations for BFM were calculated based on the total sample (n = 117): The BFM calculated from the new equation correlated highly with BFMDXA in both men (r = 0.938, p < 0.001) and women (r = 0.949, p < 0.001), as shown in Figure 1 . In men, the sum of three SFs (triceps, subscapular, and abdominal) explained 73.6% (R2 = 0.736, p < 0.001) of the variance. R2 increased by 14.5% (R2change = 0.145, p < 0.001) after inclusion of waist circumference to the regression model. In women, the sum of three SFs (triceps, subscapular, and chin) explained 70.0% (R2 = 0.700,
|
